I understand the sentiment, Charles. And I agree that diplomacy ought to be the first option.
But sometimes violence really is the only course for change. When dissenting voices are just ignored or silenced, over and over - it's either rebellion or nothing.
This professor of yours - did he talk about what was going on before some of these wars? What the cost of non violence would have been?
no subject
I understand the sentiment, Charles. And I agree that diplomacy ought to be the first option.
But sometimes violence really is the only course for change. When dissenting voices are just ignored or silenced, over and over - it's either rebellion or nothing.
This professor of yours - did he talk about what was going on before some of these wars? What the cost of non violence would have been?